On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 10:37:50AM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 15:06, Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rash...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 24 September 2011 11:59, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: > >> TABLE tab completion in psql only completes to tables, not views. but > >> the TABLE command works fine for both tables and views (and also > >> sequences). > >> > >> Seems we should just complete it to relations and not tables - or can > >> anyone see a particular reason why we shouldn't? > >> > > > > Doesn't that mean that "DROP TABLE <tab>" would offer up views as well > > as tables, which would be incorrect? > > Meh - you are correct, of course. I guess that's why we have code review :-) > > So - not a oneliner, but how about something like this? > > (Happy to have someone point out a neater way of doing it, not > entirely fluent in how we do the tab completion..)
That's pretty much it. Should it also (eventually) do SRFs? Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
