> OK, well, I applied pgsql-v9.2-drop-reworks-2.v4.1.patch and tried to
> compile, and got this:
>
> In file included from ../../../src/include/catalog/dependency.h:17,
> from dependency.c:19:
> ../../../src/include/catalog/objectaddress.h:21: warning: type
> defaults to ‘int’ in declaration of ‘ObjectAddress’
> ../../../src/include/catalog/objectaddress.h:21: error: expected ‘;’,
> ‘,’ or ‘)’ before ‘*’ token
>
> The problem here is pretty obvious: you've defined
> get_object_namespace, which takes an argument of type ObjectAddress,
> before defining the ObjectAddress datatype, which is the next thing in
> the same header file. How does that even compile for you?
>
Sorry, I didn't write out dependency of the patches.
Please apply the patches in order of part-1, part-2 then part-3.
I checked correctness of the part-2 on the tree with the part-1 already.
Both of the part-1 and part-2 patches try to modify objectaddress.h,
and the part-2 tries to add get_object_namespace() definition around
the code added by the part-1, so the patch commands get confused
and moved the hunk in front of the definition of ObjectAddress.
[kaigai@iwashi pgsql]$ cat
~/patch/pgsql-v9.2-drop-reworks-2.v4.1.patch | patch -p1
:
patching file src/backend/catalog/objectaddress.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 976 (offset -429 lines).
:
patching file src/include/catalog/objectaddress.h
Hunk #1 succeeded at 17 with fuzz 2 (offset -18 lines).
:
patching file src/test/regress/expected/drop_if_exists.out
I'm sorry again. I tought it was obvious from the filenames.
* Part-1
pgsql-v9.2-drop-reworks-1.v4.patch
* Part-2 (depends on Part-1)
pgsql-v9.2-drop-reworks-2.v4.1.patch
* Part-3 (depends on Part-1 and -2)
pgsql-v9.2-drop-reworks-3.v4.patch
Thanks,
--
KaiGai Kohei <kai...@kaigai.gr.jp>
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
