Josh Berkus wrote: > > > What is the logic for not dumping passwords but the CREATE ROLE > > statement? I don't see how anyone would recognize that behavior as > > logical. If you want to add a --no-passwords option to pg_dumpall, that > > seems more logical to me. > > That's what I'm suggesting. > > Incidentally, what's the difference between -g and -r in terms of actual > output, anyway?
Acording the docs, I assume -r is only roles, while -g includes tablespace, so what you want is already available in pg_dumpall. -- Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
