Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > I believe that we're in trouble with XIDs as soon as you have two > active XIDs that are separated by a billion, because then you could > have a situation where some people think a given XID is in the future > and others think it's in the past. I have been wondering if we should > have some sort of active guard against that scenario; I don't think we > do at present.
Sure we do. It's covered by the XID wraparound prevention logic. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers