Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > Revised patch attached. I think it would be useful to assert this > both at process startup time and at process shutdown, since it would > really be much nicer to have the process that didn't clean up fail the > assertion, rather than the new one that innocently inherited its slot; > so the attached patch takes that approach.
+1 regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers