Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Revised patch attached. I think it would be useful to assert this >> both at process startup time and at process shutdown, since it would >> really be much nicer to have the process that didn't clean up fail the >> assertion, rather than the new one that innocently inherited its slot; >> so the attached patch takes that approach.
> Something stronger than an assertion at shutdown? Run-time test? There's currently no evidence to suggest this will ever fire at all, especially not in non-development builds, so an assert seems enough to me. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers