On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 6:36 PM, Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote: > On 11/1/11 10:34 AM, Simon Riggs wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Joshua Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote: >> >>> So, we have four potential paths regarding recovery.conf: >>> >>> 1) Break backwards compatibility entirely, and stop supporting >>> recovery.conf as a trigger file at all. >> >> Note that is exactly what I have suggested when using "standby" mode >> from pg_ctl. > > I wasn't clear on that from the description of your proposal. So are > you suggesting that, if we start postgresql with "pg_ctl standby" then > recovery.conf would not behave as a trigger file?
Yes -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers