On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Thom Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > On 14 November 2011 13:32, Robert Haas <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> But Tom's point about XIDs and LSNs seems like it kind of puts a >> bullet through the heart of the whole idea. > > What about having database-level XIDs rather than cluster-level? Is that > remotely feasible?
Maybe. You'd need a set separate set for shared catalogs, too. It seems like a heck of a lot of work, though, especially since (IME, anyway) most people only really one run one database per cluster. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
