Yeb Havinga <yebhavi...@gmail.com> writes: > On 2011-11-16 15:34, Tom Lane wrote: >> The dividing line is enormously unstable though. pgstattuple's idea of >> RecentGlobalXmin could even be significantly different from that of a >> concurrently running VACUUM. I can see the point of having VACUUM log >> what it did, but opinions from the peanut gallery aren't worth much.
> I don't understand your the last remark so I want to get it clear: I > looked up peanut gallery on the wiki. Is 'opinion from the peanut > gallery' meant to describe my comments as patch reviewer? I'd appreciate > brutal honesty on this point. No no no, sorry if you read that as a personal attack. I was trying to point out that a process running pgstattuple does not have a value of RecentGlobalXmin that should be considered authoritative --- it is only a bystander, not the process that might do actual cleanup work. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers