"Kevin Grittner" <[email protected]> writes:
> Simon Riggs <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I just don't see the reason to do a global search and replace on
>> the lwlock name
> I was going to review further before commenting on that, but since
> it has now come up -- it seems odd that a source file which uses
> only LW locks needs to change so much for the FlexLock
> implementation.
Yeah, -1 on wideranging source changes for me too. There is no reason
that the current LWLock API need change. (I'm not saying that it has
to be same ABI though --- macro wrappers would be fine.)
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
