"Kevin Grittner" <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> writes: > Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> I just don't see the reason to do a global search and replace on >> the lwlock name > I was going to review further before commenting on that, but since > it has now come up -- it seems odd that a source file which uses > only LW locks needs to change so much for the FlexLock > implementation.
Yeah, -1 on wideranging source changes for me too. There is no reason that the current LWLock API need change. (I'm not saying that it has to be same ABI though --- macro wrappers would be fine.) regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers