Edward Muller <edw...@heroku.com> wrote:
> Looking for comments ...
> https://gist.github.com/be937d3a7a5323c73b6e
> We'd like to get this, or something like it, into 9.2
If you want it to be seriously considered, you should post the patch
to this list, which makes it part of the permanent archives and
indicates your willingness to place the code under the PostgreSQL
Unfortunately, you're a day late in terms of getting it reviewed in
the just-started CommitFest, but another will start in two months.
Of course, you're free to talk about it until then, and perhaps
someone will take a look at it before the next CF; but a lot of
attention will be focused on the patches submitted by the start of
the current CF.
Any chance you could help review patches in the CF in progress, to
help get others' time freed up sooner?:
It's a good way to become familiar with the process, so that you can
better move your own patch along.

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to