On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Kevin Grittner <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> wrote: > Edward Muller <edw...@heroku.com> wrote: > >> Looking for comments ... >> >> https://gist.github.com/be937d3a7a5323c73b6e >> >> We'd like to get this, or something like it, into 9.2 > > If you want it to be seriously considered, you should post the patch > to this list, which makes it part of the permanent archives and > indicates your willingness to place the code under the PostgreSQL > license.
inline .... > > http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Submitting_a_Patch#Patch_submission I think this was done right. > [snip] > > Any chance you could help review patches in the CF in progress, to > help get others' time freed up sooner?: > > https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view/inprogress Well, I'm totally new to the code base, I don't write in *C* very often (probably obvious from my patch). Maybe over time.... > > It's a good way to become familiar with the process, so that you can > better move your own patch along. > > -Kevin >
user_signal.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
