On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 11:01 PM, Kevin Grittner <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> wrote: > Pavan Deolasee <pavan.deola...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> It will be a great help if you could spare few minutes to also >> test the patch to take out the frequently accessed PGPROC members >> to a different array. We are seeing good improvements on HPUX IA >> platform and the AMD Opteron and it will be interesting to know >> what happens on the Intel platform too. >> >> > http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4eb7c4c9.9070...@enterprisedb.com > > It's going to be hard to arrange more of the 20-hours runs I've been > doing, but I can work in some more abbreviated tests. What would be > the best test for this? (I would hate to try and find out I didn't > exercise the right code path.) >
I think 2-3 runs with 32 and 128 clients each with prepared statements should suffice to quickly compare with the other numbers you posted for the master. Thanks, Pavan -- Pavan Deolasee EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
