On mån, 2011-11-21 at 10:30 -0600, Merlin Moncure wrote: > I like the idea of being able to define more flexible foreign keys, > but are we gilding the lily here? The proposed solution is really > quite specific to the nuances of arrays. Perhaps there is a more > general expression based syntax that leaves the door open for other > types conditions such as dealing fields dependent on other fields?
Yeah, basically you'd just need a contains and/or is-contained-by operator between the two types. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers