On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: >> Tom Lane wrote: >>> Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >>>> Well, if we apply this, it has the possibility to break existing >>>> dumps. > > BTW, it occurs to me that we could dodge that objection, with much less > work than Robert suggests, if we just made the message be a WARNING not > an ERROR. I think that'd do just as well in terms of what the message > could usefully accomplish, ie, steer people away from doing things that > won't work. Still not sure that it's worth doing though, >
i'm fine with a WARNING -- Jaime Casanova www.2ndQuadrant.com Professional PostgreSQL: Soporte 24x7 y capacitación -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
