On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Jaime Casanova <ja...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: >>> Tom Lane wrote: >>>> Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >>>>> Well, if we apply this, it has the possibility to break existing >>>>> dumps. >> >> BTW, it occurs to me that we could dodge that objection, with much less >> work than Robert suggests, if we just made the message be a WARNING not >> an ERROR. I think that'd do just as well in terms of what the message >> could usefully accomplish, ie, steer people away from doing things that >> won't work. Still not sure that it's worth doing though, >> > > i'm fine with a WARNING
Me too; I suggested it before (so did you). -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
