On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 10:19 PM, Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> wrote: >> I'm also a bit concerned about the relationship between this and the >> existing -s option. It seems odd that you use --schema-only to get >> the behavior database-wide, and --exclude-table-data to get it for >> just one table. Is there some way we can make that a bit more >> consistent? > > It's consistent, and was designed to be, with the --exclude-table option. > I'm not sure what you want it to look like instead. But TBH I'm more > interested in getting the functionality than in how it's spelled.
Ah, hmm. Well, maybe it's fine the way that you have it. But I'd be tempted to at least add a sentence to the sgml documentation for each option referring to the other, e.g. "To dump only schema for all tables in the database, see --schema-only." and "To exclude table data for only a subset of tables in the database, see --exclude-table-data.", or something along those lines. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
