Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> I can get behind this argument: force all stuff through ProcessUtility >> for regularity, and not necessarily in the first patch for this feature. > > That seems like a pretty heavy dependency on an implementation detail > that we might want to change at some point.
Given ProcessUtility_hook, how much of an implementation detail rather than a public API are we talking about? Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
