On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> But I think the important point is that this is an obscure corner case. Let
> me say that one
more time: obscure corner case!
+1
> The only reason JSON needs to care about this at all is that it allows
> \u1234 to mean Unicode code point 0x1234. But for that detail, JSON
> would be encoding-agnostic. So I think it's sufficient for us to
> simply decide that that particular feature may not work (or even, will
> not work) for non-ASCII characters if you use a non-UTF8 encoding.
> There's still plenty of useful things that can be done with JSON even
> if that particular feature is not available; and that way we don't
> have to completely disable the data type just because someone wants to
> use EUC-JP or something.
So, if the server encoding is not UTF-8, should we ban Unicode escapes:
"\u00FCber"
or non-ASCII characters?
"über"
Also:
* What if the server encoding is SQL_ASCII?
* What if the server encoding is UTF-8, but the client encoding is
something else (e.g. SQL_ASCII)?
- Joey
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
