On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:44 AM, amit sehas <cu...@yahoo.com> wrote: > It seems that the task of fetching next n results without moving the cursor > seems like too complicated to implement for any query that has > even a little bit of complication in it...
I think that's probably true. It would also be expensive if you did implement it; who wants to go re-execute a join to back up the scan? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
