On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 9:06 PM, David E. Wheeler <da...@kineticode.com> wrote: > On Dec 20, 2011, at 10:39 AM, Claes Jakobsson wrote: >> Are people explicitly asking for a) *JSON* datatype or b) a type that lets >> you store arbitrary complex semi-untyped data structures? > > Yes. > >> if b) then this might get a lot more interesting > > JSON is the most popular/likely way to represent that, I think.
On that note, here's an updated version of the patch I posted upthread, with some regression tests and minimal documentation. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
json-rmh-v2.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
