On 01/13/2012 12:31 AM, Hitoshi Harada wrote:
So my conclusion is it's better than nothing, but we could do better job here.
From timeline perspective, it'd be ok to apply this patch and improve more later in 9.3+.
I agree, let's look at the items other than the target list during 9.3. But I do think this addresses the biggest pain point.
Thanks for the review. cheers andrew -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
