On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 3:45 AM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 09:37, Greg Smith <g...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> On 01/15/2012 03:17 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: >>> And FWIW, I'd find it a lot more useful for the CF app to have the >>> ability to post *reviews* in it, that would end up being properly >>> threaded. >> >> Next you'll be saying we should have some sort of web application to help >> with the whole review process, show the work on an integrated sort of Review >> Board or something. What crazy talk. > > Well, it's early in the morning for being sunday, I blame that. > >> My contribution toward patch review ease for this week is that peg is quite >> a bit smarter about referring to the correct part of the origin git repo >> now, when you've been working on a branch for a while then create a new one: >> https://github.com/gregs1104/peg > > Being able to refer to a git branch is one of those things that have > been on the todo list for the cf app since pgcon last year...
Do we have an actual written TODO list for the cf app somewhere? If not, I think creating one would be a good idea. I realize I've been remiss in addressing some of the things people want, but the lack of any centralized place where such items are collected doesn't make it simpler. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
