> Should every elog() have an error code? I'm not sure -- there are many
> elog() calls that will never been seen by the user, since the error
> they represent will be caught before control reaches the elog (e.g.
> parse errors, internal consistency checks, multiple elog(ERROR)
> for the same user error, etc.) Perhaps for those error messages
> that don't have numbers, we could just give them ERRNO_UNKNOWN or
> a similar constant.

It might be cool to a little command utility "pg_error" or whatever that you
pass an error code to and it prints out a very detailed description of the
problem...

Chris


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?

http://archives.postgresql.org

Reply via email to