On 08.01.2012 22:36, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
The extension mechanism we added in 9.1 is aimed at allowing a fully
integrated contrib management, which was big enough a goal to preclude
doing anything else in its first release.

Hooray!

Now we have it and we can think some more about what features we want
covered, and a pretty obvious one that's been left out is the ability to
define and update an extension without resorting to file system support
for those extensions that do not need a shared object library. We could
have been calling that “SQL ONLY” extensions, but to simplify the
grammar support I did use the “inline” keyword so there we go.

Frankly I don't see the point of this. If the extension is an independent piece of (SQL) code, developed separately from an application, with its own lifecycle, a .sql file seems like the best way to distribute it. If it's not, ie. if it's an integral part of the database schema, then why package it as an extension in the first place?

Please find attached a WIP patch implementing that.  Note that the main
core benefit to integrating this feature is the ability to easily add
regression tests for extension related features.  Which is not done yet
in the attached.

I'm not sure I buy that argument. These inline extensions are sufficiently different from regular extensions that I think you'd need to have regression tests for both kinds, anyway.

I'm sending this quite soon because of the pg_dump support.  When an
extension is inline, we want to dump its content, as we currently do in
the binary dump output.  I had in mind that we could output a full
CREATE EXTENSION INLINE script in between some dollar-quoting rather
than adding each extension's object with a ALTER EXTENSION ... ADD line
like what pg_upgrade compatibility is currently doing.

I thought the main point of extensions is that that they're not included in pg_dump. Again, if the extension is an integral part of the database, then it probably shouldn't be an extension in the first place.

--
  Heikki Linnakangas
  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to