On 07.02.2012 09:03, Fujii Masao wrote:
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Fujii Masao<masao.fu...@gmail.com>  wrote:
When I compiled HEAD with --disable-integer-datetimes and tested
pg_receivexlog, I encountered unexpected replication timeout. As
far as I read the pg_receivexlog code, the cause of this problem is
that pg_receivexlog handles the standby message timeout incorrectly
in --disable-integer-datetimes. The attached patch fixes this problem.
Comments?

receivelog.c
-------
        timeout.tv_sec = last_status + standby_message_timeout - now - 1;
        if (timeout.tv_sec<= 0)
-------

Umm.. the above code also handles the timestamp incorrectly. ISTM that the
root cause of these problems is that receivelog.c uses TimestampTz.

Yep. While localGetCurrentTimestamp() returns a TimestampTz and handles float timestamps correctly, the caller just assigns the result to a int64 variable, assuming --enable-integer-datetimes.

What about changing receivelog.c so that it uses time_t instead of
TimestampTz? Which would make the code simpler, I think.

Hmm, that would reduce granularity to seconds. The --statusint option is given in seconds, but it would be good to have more precision in the calculations to avoid rounding errors.

But actually, if the purpose of the --statusint option is to avoid disconnection because of exceeding the server's replication_timeout, one second granularity just isn't enough to be begin with. replication_timeout is given in milliseconds, so if you set replication_timeout=900ms in the server, there is no way to make pg_basebackup/pg_receivexlog to reply in time.

So, --statusint needs to be in milliseconds. And while we're at it, how difficult would be to ask the server for the current value of replication_timeout, and set --statusint automatically based on that? Or perhaps mark replication_timeout as GUC_REPORT. It is rather fiddly that depending on a server setting, you need to pass an option in the client or it will just silently fail with no indication of what the problem is.

--
  Heikki Linnakangas
  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to