Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> On 07.02.2012 09:03, Fujii Masao wrote:
>> What about changing receivelog.c so that it uses time_t instead of
>> TimestampTz? Which would make the code simpler, I think.
> Hmm, that would reduce granularity to seconds.
It also creates portability issues that I'd just as soon not deal with,
ie, time_t is not the same width on all platforms. (The integer vs
float TimestampTz issue is a kind of portability problem, but we've
already bought into the assumption that sender and receiver must be
built with the same choice, no?)
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
