Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 1:24 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> That seems pretty nearly entirely bogus. What is the argument for
>> supposing that the word right after SELECT is a function name?
> It isn't necessarily, but it might be. It'd certainly be nice to type:
> SELECT pg_si<TAB>
> and get:
> SELECT pg_size_pretty(
Yeah, and then you'll type
SELECT pg_size_pretty(pg_dat<TAB>
and get nothing, and curse the authors of such a misbegotten incomplete
concept that leads your fingers to rely on something that doesn't work
where it should.
I'm not against tab-completing functions, if people think that's
useful. I am against tab-completing them in 1% of use-cases, which is
what this patch accomplishes. The fact that it's short doesn't make it
good.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
