On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 7:56 PM, Joachim Wieland <j...@mcknight.de> wrote: >> So we at least need to press on far enough to get to that point. > > Sure, let me know if I can help you with something.
Alright. I think (hope) that I've pushed this far enough to serve the needs of parallel pg_dump. The error handling is still pretty grotty and might need a bit more surgery to handle the parallel case, but I think that making this actually not ugly will require eliminating the Archive/ArchiveHandle distinction, which is probably a good thing to do but, as you point out, maybe not the first priority right now. Can you provide an updated patch? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
