On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> wrote: > yes > > 2012/2/27 Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com>: >> On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> Hello >>> >>> I tested creating some larger indexes >>> >>> There was a warning: >>> >>> postgres=# CREATE INDEX idx_resource_name ON resource (name, tid); >>> WARNING: concurrent insert in progress within table "resource" >>> >>> I am sure so there was only one active session - so this warning is strange. >>> > > sure > > I tried generate data from > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2012-02/msg00210.php > example > > I used pg from yesterday GIT repository > > and my configuration was > > shared buffers 500MB > maintenance_work_mem 200MB > wal_buffers 64MB > checkpoint_segments 32
Is this repeatable? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
