On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> I guess the question is whether this is a stop-ship item for spgist. >> If it is, then we're going to have to spend the time to fix this, but >> if not, then since it was submitted more than two weeks after the >> start of the CommitFest, it seems we should postpone it to 9.3. > > If we buy into the assumption that nulls support can/should be bolted on > after the fact, then postponing it to 9.3 would be reasonable. I wasn't > very happy with that idea though, and would like to look at this issue > before 9.2 gets frozen. So please don't pull it from the CF yet.
OK. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
