On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 12:47 AM, Jaime Casanova <ja...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >>> Sorry, here's the patch rebased and with the suggestion from Alex. >>> Which reminds me, I never thank him for the review (shame on me) :D >> >> with the patch this time > > This may be a stupid idea, but it seems to me that it might be better > to dispense with all of the logic in here to detect whether the file > name is still going to be long enough after chomping the extension. I > feel like that's just making things complicated.
while i like the idea of separating the logic, i don't like the results: for example i tried this (notice that i forgot the point), and it just says nothing (not even that the file with the extension but without the point doesn't exist). that's why we were checking that the length matches $ ./pg_archivecleanup -x "bz2" /tmp 000000010000000100000058 $ -- Jaime Casanova www.2ndQuadrant.com Professional PostgreSQL: Soporte 24x7 y capacitación -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
