On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Jaime Casanova <ja...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> $ ./pg_archivecleanup -x "bz2" /tmp 000000010000000100000058 >>> >>> Hmm, but I thought that the idea was that the extension was optional. >>> Perhaps I'm missing something but I don't think the previous patch >>> will complain about that either; or at least I don't see why the >>> behavior should be any different. >> >> Can someone enlighten me on this point? >> > > mmm! you're right... it's not complaining either... i was sure it was... > and i'm not sure i want to contor things for that... > > so, just forget my last mail about that... your refactor is just fine for me
OK, committed that way. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
