On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 7:38 PM, Ants Aasma <a...@cybertec.at> wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> This seems to have bitrotted again.  :-(
>>> Can you please rebase again?
>> Rebased.
> I've committed the core of this.  I left out the stats collector
> stuff, because it's still per-table and I think perhaps we should back
> off to just per-database.  I changed it so that it does not conflate
> wait time with I/O time.  Maybe there should be a separate method of
> measuring wait time, but I don't think it's a good idea for the
> per-backend stats to measure a different thing than what gets reported
> up to the stats collector - we should have ONE definition of each
> counter.  I also tweaked the EXPLAIN output format a bit, and the
> docs.

And I've now committed the pg_stat_statements code as well, hopefully
not stomping too badly one what Tom's apparently in the midst of doing
with Peter's pg_stat_statements patch.  I committed this almost
exactly as submitted; just a minor code style correction and a few
documentation enhancements.

Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to