On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 02:22:24AM +0200, Marko Kreen wrote: > Main advantage of including PQgetRow() together with low-level > rowproc API is that it allows de-emphasizing more complex parts of > rowproc API (exceptions, early exit, skipresult, custom error msg). > And drop/undocument them or simply call them postgres-internal-only.
I thought more about exceptions and PQgetRow and found interesting pattern: - Exceptions are problematic if always allowed. Although PQexec() is easy to fix in current code, trying to keep to promise of "exceptions are allowed from everywhere" adds non-trivial maintainability overhead to future libpq changes, so instead we should simply fix documentation. Especially as I cannot see any usage scenario that would benefit from such promise. - Multiple SELECTs from PQexec() are problematic even without exceptions: additional documentation is needed how to detect that rows are coming from new statement. Now the interesting one: - PQregisterProcessor() API allows changing the callback permanently. Thus breaking any user code which simply calls PQexec() and expects regular PGresult back. Again, nothing to fix code-wise, need to document that callback should be set only for current query, later changed back. My conclusion is that row-processor API is low-level expert API and quite easy to misuse. It would be preferable to have something more robust as end-user API, the PQgetRow() is my suggestion for that. Thus I see 3 choices: 1) Push row-processor as main API anyway and describe all dangerous scenarios in documentation. 2) Have both PQgetRow() and row-processor available in <libpq-fe.h>, PQgetRow() as preferred API and row-processor for expert usage, with proper documentation what works and what does not. 3) Have PQgetRow() in <libpq-fe.h>, move row-processor to <libpq-int.h>. I guess this needs committer decision which way to go? Second conclusion is that current dblink row-processor usage is broken when user uses multiple SELECTs in SQL as dblink uses plain PQexec(). Simplest fix would be to use PQexecParams() instead, but if keeping old behaviour is important, then dblink needs to emulate PQexec() resultset behaviour with row-processor or PQgetRow(). -- marko -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers