> I've applied a modified form of the conname update patch. It seemed to > me that the fault is really in the DBLINK_GET_CONN and > DBLINK_GET_NAMED_CONN macros, which ought to be responsible for setting > the surrounding function's conname variable along with conn, rconn, etc. > There was actually a second error of the same type visible in the dblink > regression test, which is also fixed by this more general method.
Come to think of it, the patch is mere a verifying touch for the bug mingled with the other part of the dblink patch to all appearances. I totally agree with you. It should be dropped for this time and done another time. I'am sorry for bothering you by such a damn thing. regards, -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
