Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > accomplish. Instead, you're just concerned about allowing some but > not all versions of package A to provide feature F, so that other > extensions can depend on F to get the specific version of A that they > need (and not, as I had assumed, so that they can get either A or B).
Exactly. > Let me think more about that. Maybe I'm just easily confused here, or > maybe there is something that should be changed in the code or docs; > I'm not sure yet. Agreed, there's certainly something to expand on here. > On a more prosaic note, you seem to have made a mistake when > generating the v5 diff. It includes reverts of a couple of unrelated, > recent patches. Ouch. It seems to happen to me too often. I probably need to get the shallow clones setup where you have different directories hosting each a different git branch so that you don't need to checkout just to update your local master, etc. >> WTF? WTF? > > On a further note, I have spent a heck of a lot more time reviewing > other people's patches this CommitFest than you have, and I don't > appreciate this. If you'd rather that I didn't spend time on this > patch, I have plenty of other things to do with my time. Sorry about that. I'm on a crazy schedule and too tired, and I wanted to be sure to attract your attention on a misunderstanding here. It's also not clear to me what level of language WTF really is, or “dude” to take another example. I'll be sure not to use that again when I aim at being polite yet dense. Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
