Excerpts from Peter Eisentraut's message of mié abr 04 15:53:20 -0300 2012: > ... would be really nice to have. Especially pgbench and pg_upgrade for > me, but it would be useful to have man pages for everything. > > Unfortunately, we can't just replace the sect1's in in Appendix F [0] > with refentry's, because the content model of DocBook doesn't allow > that. (You can't have a mixed sequence of sect1 and refentry, only one > or the other.)
Hm, would it work to have something like <sect1> &pgbench; </sect1> <refentry> &pgbench; </refentry> so that we get both? Probably with some conditional to avoid duplicate output in html/pdf. (Why isn't this a problem for the SPI pages or dblink?) > I think it would be useful to split this up into three sections: > > F.1. Extensions > F.2. Client Applications > F.3. Server Applications > > where the first looks like now and the other two contain the refentry > pages. +1, but is there something that would not fit in either category? Not sure if we have a SGML page for init-scripts for instance. If you're going to monkey around in this general, please also look at the README. It should probably just go away. -- Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
