Shigeru Hanada <shigeru.han...@gmail.com> writes: > On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> In >> particular I do not like the specific way it's done in the v7 patch >> (I've not looked at v8 yet) because the interposed logic has a >> hard-wired assumption that foreign tables do not have inheritance >> children. Â I think that assumption has a life expectancy measured in >> months at most, and I don't want to have to try to fix every FDW when >> it changes. Â But I think we can easily revise the hook details to fix >> that, and I'm hoping to get that done today.
> I'll try implementing the design you suggested. I've already got it fixed up ... regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers