Shigeru Hanada <shigeru.han...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> In
>> particular I do not like the specific way it's done in the v7 patch
>> (I've not looked at v8 yet) because the interposed logic has a
>> hard-wired assumption that foreign tables do not have inheritance
>> children. Â I think that assumption has a life expectancy measured in
>> months at most, and I don't want to have to try to fix every FDW when
>> it changes. Â But I think we can easily revise the hook details to fix
>> that, and I'm hoping to get that done today.
> I'll try implementing the design you suggested.
I've already got it fixed up ...
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
