Peter Geoghegan <pe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 29 March 2012 21:05, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Barring objections I'll go fix this, and then this patch can be
>> considered closed except for possible future tweaking of the
>> sticky-entry decay rule.

> Attached patch fixes a bug, and tweaks sticky-entry decay.

Applied with some cosmetic adjustments.

                        regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to