On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 09:50:43PM +0100, Thom Brown wrote:
> On 11 April 2012 21:46, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote:
> > Since we are wacking around pg_stat_activity for 9.2, what do people
> > think about these column names?
> >
> >         backend_start    | timestamp with time zone |
> >         xact_start       | timestamp with time zone |
> >         query_start      | timestamp with time zone |
> >
> > Arguably:
> >
> >        backend_start -> session_start
> >        query_start -> statment_start
> >
> > Should we make any of these changes?
> 
> Sounds like a lot of potential breakage to solve something I don't
> think is a problem.  Besides, isn't the door for 9.2 changes now
> closed and bolted?

Well, we renamed procpid -> pid and I noticed these others.  Not sure if
it is a win or not, but just asking.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <br...@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to