On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 09:50:43PM +0100, Thom Brown wrote: > On 11 April 2012 21:46, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > > Since we are wacking around pg_stat_activity for 9.2, what do people > > think about these column names? > > > > backend_start | timestamp with time zone | > > xact_start | timestamp with time zone | > > query_start | timestamp with time zone | > > > > Arguably: > > > > backend_start -> session_start > > query_start -> statment_start > > > > Should we make any of these changes? > > Sounds like a lot of potential breakage to solve something I don't > think is a problem. Besides, isn't the door for 9.2 changes now > closed and bolted?
Well, we renamed procpid -> pid and I noticed these others. Not sure if it is a win or not, but just asking. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers