On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 11:11:18PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > >> > Should we make any of these changes? > >> > >> Sounds like a lot of potential breakage to solve something I don't > >> think is a problem. Besides, isn't the door for 9.2 changes now > >> closed and bolted? > > > > Well, we renamed procpid -> pid and I noticed these others. Not sure if > > it is a win or not, but just asking. > > We also renamed current_query -> query, but that was mainly because it > actually changed meaning. > > But. Since we already whacked around procpid->pid, yes, if we're ever > going to change those, now is the time, really. > > I think at least backend_start -> session_start would make sense. > > Not sure about the other one - what's wrong with query_start?
We consistently use "statement" for commands, not "queries", because some feel query means SELECT. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
