On 04/18/2012 11:29 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
Peter Eisentraut<pete...@gmx.net> wrote:
On ons, 2012-04-18 at 13:33 +0300, Alex Shulgin wrote:
I wonder why do people keep complaining how their bug tracker of
choice sucks, instead of doing something about that.
Lack of time, and to some degree a lack of clarity of what they
want out of the thing. (Most people are very clear on what they
don't want.)
Personally, I haven't worked with one which had the data organized
in what I would consider a sensible and useful way.
Part of the trouble is that the whole area is fuzzy. So any organization
that imposes some sort of order on the data will not fit well in some
cases. Most tracker systems have ended up either trying to cater for
increasingly complex and varied circumstances, or staying simple and
more or less throwing in the towel on the complexity problem.
That doesn't necessarily mean that it's not worth having a tracker, just
that we need to recognize the limitations.
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
