On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:49 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm > suspicious of s_lock.h's support for National Semiconductor 32K, > Renesas' M32R, Renesas' SuperH, UNIVEL, SINIX / Reliant UNIX, > Nextstep, and Sun3
Were there ever multiprocessor Nextstep or Sun3 machines anyways? Wouldn't someone on these OSes want spinlocks to immediately sleep anyways? I did experiment a while back with getting a vax emulator going to build postgres on it but even then I was running NetBSD. -- greg -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
