On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 2:41 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> It is getting a bit late to be considering such changes for 9.2, but >> I'm willing to review and commit this if there's not anybody who feels >> strongly that it's too late. Personally I think it's in the nature of >> cleanup and so fair game as long as we haven't formally started beta. >> However I will confess to some bias about wanting to get the server's >> idle wake-up rate down, because Fedora people have been bugging me >> about that for a long time now. So I'm probably not the best person to >> objectively evaluate whether we should hold this for 9.3. Comments? > > Well, I feel that one of the weaknesses of our CommitFest process is > that changes like this (which are really pretty small) end up having > the same deadline as patches that are large (command triggers, > checksums, etc.); in fact, they sometimes end up having an earlier > deadline, because the people doing the big stuff end up continuing to > hack on it for another couple months while the door is shut to smaller > improvements. So I'm not going to object if you feel like slipping > this one in. I looked it over myself and I think it's broadly > reasonable, although I'm not too sure about the particular criteria > chosen for sending the WAL writer to sleep and waking it up again. > And like you I'd like to see some more improvement in this area.
I agree that it's ok to slip it in given that it's "finishing off a patch from earlier". I think it's reasonable to hold it to a little bit higher review stadards since it's that late in the cycle though, such as two people reviewing it before it goes in (or 1 reviewer + 1 committer - and of course, unless it's a truly trivial patch). Which it seems you both are doing now, so that makes it ok ;) -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers