Simon Riggs <[email protected]> writes:
> On 7 May 2012 18:09, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I also notice that the separate-checkpointer patch failed to rename
>> assorted things like BgWriterCommLock, BgWriterRequest,
>> BgWriterShmemStruct, which are all 100% inappropriately named now.
>> And it still contains various obsolete comments referring to itself
>> as the background writer. Will see about cleaning that up.
> For want of a better name, keeping them the same seemed best.
I was just thinking s/BgWriter/Checkpointer/, do you think that's too
long?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
