On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: > I had a request from a customer asking if we could make a switch to > specifically disable the "unexpected EOF" message that fills lots of > peoples logs. Along the same way that we have a flag to turn off the > "nonstandard use of string escapes" message that is another culprit > (that's actually a much *worse* problem than just the unexpected EOF). > The unexpected EOF message *does* indicate the client is doing > something stupid, but it's not like it's an *actual problem* in pretty > much every deployment out there... > > Would we consider adding such a switch (it should be easy enough to > do), or do we want to push this off to the mythical "let's improve the > logging subsystem" project that might eventually materialize if we're > lucky? Meaning - would people object to such a switch?
Yes, if the new parameter allows a generic filter on multiple user-specified message types. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
