On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: >>> I had a request from a customer asking if we could make a switch to >>> specifically disable the "unexpected EOF" message that fills lots of >>> peoples logs. > >> Yes, if the new parameter allows a generic filter on multiple >> user-specified message types. > > I agree with Simon --- a disable for that specific message seems like a > kluge, and an ugly one at that. (The right solution for this customer > is to fix their broken application.) But a generic filter capability > might be useful enough to justify its keep.
Are you thinking basically "regexp against the main text", or something else, when you say "generic filter capacity"? -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
