On Sat, May 05, 2012 at 12:08:00PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > > On Sat, May 05, 2012 at 11:26:32AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > >> Possibly. What exactly is the difference between the "sco" and > >> "unixware" ports, anyway? The one buildfarm member we have running > >> SCO software (koi) chooses the unixware template. > > > Unixware was based on Unix System Labs System V, Release 4, while SCO > > was based on a 286 port of SVr2, or something like that. > > Oh, so the "sco" port actually refers to OpenServer? > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SCO_OpenServer > > That page makes it sound like it's more or less as current as Unixware, > since both had their last updates in 2008/2009 timeframe (and both > are presumably never going to see another one, with SCO the company > being dead in all but name). > > The difference from our perspective is that we have a buildfarm member > running Unixware, whereas it's anybody's guess whether the "sco" port > still works or not.
Yes, sorry, I should have been clearer. SCO is both an OS and a company. The 'sco' references OpenServer. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
