Excerpts from Peter Geoghegan's message of jue may 10 09:12:57 -0400 2012: > On 10 May 2012 13:45, Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> wrote: > > Right, but I think it would be good to identify them explicitly as reviewers > > if we're going to include the names. > > +1. I think we should probably do more to credit reviewers. It's not > uncommon for a reviewer to end up becoming a co-author, particularly > if they're a committer, but it's a little misleading to add a reviewer > after the feature description without qualifying that they are the > reviewer.
Agreed. What about crediting patch sponsors (other than the author's employer, I mean)? I remember crediting one in a commit message and being told it wasn't okay. Is it okay to credit them in the release notes? -- Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers